For clarity, there's no option to edit comments, the President asked the candidate that has been chosen by the OKCO Central Committee, which is their right, if he had any religious, moral, political,, or other proclivity that would prevent him from voting TO certify any election results, or that would cause him to vote AGAINST certifying election results. The implication is that he has no ability to do that. Cheryl Williams, as you know, voted against certification of the December 12th election because of the questions she had regarding the process. There also is a question if this meeting is proper. The County Central Committee appoints their choice to the County Election Board.
Thank you, Steve. It's even worse than this article states and yours, as well. I just walked out of a meeting where a replacement for Cheryl Williams was asked beforehand by the President of the State Election Board if he had any moral, religious, political or other proclivity that would prevent him from certifying election results or voting against certifying election results. The questioner? Ms. Cline who should have recused herself from this meeting.
My conscience doesn't allow me to voluntarily sit and watch processes I know to be in violation of the inherent God given rights of human beings.
Great article. Glad you were in attendance to witness and report on these events.
For clarity, there's no option to edit comments, the President asked the candidate that has been chosen by the OKCO Central Committee, which is their right, if he had any religious, moral, political,, or other proclivity that would prevent him from voting TO certify any election results, or that would cause him to vote AGAINST certifying election results. The implication is that he has no ability to do that. Cheryl Williams, as you know, voted against certification of the December 12th election because of the questions she had regarding the process. There also is a question if this meeting is proper. The County Central Committee appoints their choice to the County Election Board.
Yes - the State Election Board has no authority to approve or deny any nominee. They can just remove them later, for no reason at all.
Thank you, Steve. It's even worse than this article states and yours, as well. I just walked out of a meeting where a replacement for Cheryl Williams was asked beforehand by the President of the State Election Board if he had any moral, religious, political or other proclivity that would prevent him from certifying election results or voting against certifying election results. The questioner? Ms. Cline who should have recused herself from this meeting.
My conscience doesn't allow me to voluntarily sit and watch processes I know to be in violation of the inherent God given rights of human beings.
Thank you for your report
Of course.